You want a clean answer
Will Revolut become a trillion-dollar company? I don’t know. You don’t know. Revolut doesn’t know. The book asks the more irritating question: what would it have to become for the question to stop sounding absurd?
There is a line usually pinned on Oscar Wilde — “they say such dreadful things about you; they must be true” — that Wilde never said. The author would quote it anyway, while cheerfully informing you it’s apocryphal. So allow me to perform the public service he is constitutionally incapable of performing for himself, and talk you out of it.
They say such dreadful things about this book. It must be wonderful.— Oscar Wilde (apocryphal)
A brutally honest field guide to the people for whom this book is absolutely not intended, and the comforts it stubbornly refuses to provide. If, having read it, you still insist on buying the damn thing — that is between you and your better judgement.
Will Revolut become a trillion-dollar company? I don’t know. You don’t know. Revolut doesn’t know. The book asks the more irritating question: what would it have to become for the question to stop sounding absurd?
It refuses both worship and prosecution. It admires Revolut and thinks parts of its culture are dangerous — in the same paragraph. Interested criticism, not a verdict for hire.
No hero founder, no seven habits, no twelve rules, no neat arc from garage to IPO ending with capitalism and the author’s personal brand shaking hands under flattering lighting.
No leaked screenshots. No anonymous “senior leaders close to the matter.” No childhood-trauma bullet points. It hunts patterns of behaviour instead of recycling anecdotes — which, to the gossip-addicted, reads as a personal attack.
Especially stay away. A bank with tens of millions of verified users isn’t where money sleeps — it’s a mint for trust. Once you see identity as infrastructure, you can’t un-see it. The author seems determined to drag you there.
It is rude about beautiful ideas that skipped their compliance homework, and about people who just discovered the word “agent” and now intend to attach it to every object in the universe — coffee machines, municipal bins, possibly grief.
It keeps labelling itself — fact, inference, what-if. Certainty is rationed; doubt gets more pages than is polite. Every time you start to nod along, a label says: speculation zone, proceed at your own risk.
Two volumes. One is a rave, not a roadmap. The other is the receipts — the Monday-morning version. The author could not decide between scripture and a spreadsheet, so, with his trademark restraint, he wrote both.
A man nobody asked wrote two volumes to seize the attention of a CEO who has never heard of him, recruited four professors as character witnesses, and stamped trillion-dollar on the cover. The audacity is not an accident; it is the argument.
Every absence in this book is deliberate. Here is the trade you are being offered, stated plainly, so no one can say the label lied.
People will tell you the book is too something. They are right. Here is the charge sheet — received, logged, and reframed before it arrives.
So: you have been warned, thoroughly and in good faith. The book is biased, overlong, immodest, speculative, and written by a man who misquotes the dead on purpose and the living by accident.
If that is disqualifying, go in peace. If it is not — if a warning this comprehensive has somehow left you more curious than you were a page ago, against your own better judgement — then I am afraid you were always going to read it.
You were warned. It is, nevertheless, one click away.